<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>ai on tty</title><link>https://tty.mansuri.me/tags/ai/</link><description>Recent content in ai on tty</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://tty.mansuri.me/tags/ai/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Apple's Reframe: A Moment That Never Was</title><link>https://tty.mansuri.me/posts/~apple-reframe-a-moment-that-never-was/</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://tty.mansuri.me/posts/~apple-reframe-a-moment-that-never-was/</guid><description>&lt;img src="https://tty.mansuri.me/images/posts/spatial-reframing-screenshot.png" alt="Apple Spatial Reframing demo" style="max-width:85%; margin-bottom:1.5rem;"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday&amp;rsquo;s WWDC &amp;lsquo;26 keynote brought the usual slew of product updates and AI features. Most of the online discourse in my bubble has fixated on Siri AI, but I want to focus on something quieter that Apple demoed for the Photos app: a feature it calls &lt;a href="https://www.youtube.com/live/hF8swzNR1-o?t=3844" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Spatial Reframing&lt;/a&gt;
or Reframe for short. Linked YouTube video is timestamped. Here is a &lt;a href="https://www.apple.com/uk/newsroom/2026/06/apple-intelligence-brings-powerful-ai-capabilities-into-everyday-experiences/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;press release&lt;/a&gt;
with demo shots.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is a spatial editing feature that lets you change the angle of a photo you have already taken. If your subject was not looking directly at the lens, you can seemingly &amp;ldquo;correct&amp;rdquo; that after the fact. Say you have a photo of a dog under an arch and the framing is not quite symmetrical. You wish you had captured it from a slightly better angle. Now you can &amp;ldquo;fix&amp;rdquo; that in post.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Video: VibeOS - Fully Hallucinated Operating System</title><link>https://tty.mansuri.me/links/~vibeos-fully-hallucinated-operating-system/</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://tty.mansuri.me/links/~vibeos-fully-hallucinated-operating-system/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Leave it to a Brit to deliver satire with a straight face in the most deadpan style. This had me in stitches, even my wife joined in to watch the whole thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update&lt;/strong&gt;: For anyone curious, presenter is &lt;a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevesanderson-uk/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Steve Sanderson&lt;/a&gt;
and a little bit of context in this &lt;a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/markrussinovich_vibeos-fully-hallucinated-operating-system-activity-7468391266423107584-WS86" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;LinkedIn Post.&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>May 2026</title><link>https://tty.mansuri.me/digests/~2026-05-digest/</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://tty.mansuri.me/digests/~2026-05-digest/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Nine things, Space, Rust, Pi? Oh my!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.axios.com/2026/05/17/ai-backlash-polling-sentiment" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;An AI Hate Wave Is Here&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Asked about backlash to AI, Superhuman Mail CEO Rahul Vohra — whose company makes an AI-powered email assistant — seemed unfamiliar with the premise of the question. After hearing about poor polling around AI, he responded: &amp;ldquo;We don&amp;rsquo;t really see that.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/5/24/pi-oss/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"&gt;Building Pi with Pi&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Keep in mind that AI has not increased the number of people who need software, or the number of maintainers who can review it. It has mostly increased the amount of code and the number of projects competing for attention. Some of that is healthy, but a lot of it fragments effort that should be shared.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The last six months in LLMs in five minutes</title><link>https://tty.mansuri.me/links/~the-last-six-months-in/</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://tty.mansuri.me/links/~the-last-six-months-in/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Simon Willison&amp;rsquo;s annotated lightning talk from PyCon US 2026.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenAI and Anthropic had spent most of 2025 running Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards to increase the quality of code written by their models, especially when paired up with their Codex and Claude Code agent harnesses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In November the results of this work became apparent. Coding agents went from often-work to mostly-work, crossing a quality barrier where you could use them as a daily-driver to get real work done, without needing to spend most of your time fixing their stupid mistakes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>If AI writes your code, why use Python?</title><link>https://tty.mansuri.me/links/~if-ai-writes-your-code/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://tty.mansuri.me/links/~if-ai-writes-your-code/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The argument from the title: Python&amp;rsquo;s ergonomics were optimized for humans, and humans are increasingly not the proximate authors. If the model is happy writing Rust, the case for the slower-runtime, weaker-typed alternative gets thinner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The last twenty years of language choice were shaped by a single constraint: humans write the code, and humans are slow at low-level languages. That constraint is gone. Stack Overflow’s 2025 survey had Rust as the most-admired language for the tenth consecutive year at 72%, with Gleam at 70%, Elixir at 66%, and Zig at 64%. The stated preference was always there; the tooling finally caught up to the preference.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>