<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>learning on tty</title><link>https://tty.mansuri.me/tags/learning/</link><description>Recent content in learning on tty</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://tty.mansuri.me/tags/learning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI should elevate your thinking, not replace it</title><link>https://tty.mansuri.me/links/~ai-should-elevate-your-thinking/</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://tty.mansuri.me/links/~ai-should-elevate-your-thinking/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Koshy John on what the tool is good for and what it is not. The argument is small and worth keeping: use the model to extend the questions you can ask, not to skip the part where you think the answer through. His analogies are spot on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Going back to the analogies: This is like copying answers through university and then showing up to a job that requires independent thought. It is like using a calculator for every arithmetic task and never developing number sense. It is like relying on self-driving features before learning how to actually drive. The support system may make you look functional, but it does not make you capable.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>