<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>rust on tty/*</title><link>https://tty.mansuri.me/tags/rust/</link><description>Recent content in rust on tty/*</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-gb</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://tty.mansuri.me/tags/rust/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>If AI writes your code, why use Python?</title><link>https://tty.mansuri.me/links/~if-ai-writes-your-code/</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://tty.mansuri.me/links/~if-ai-writes-your-code/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The argument from the title: Python&amp;rsquo;s ergonomics were optimized for humans, and humans are increasingly not the proximate authors. If the model is happy writing Rust, the case for the slower-runtime, weaker-typed alternative gets thinner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The last twenty years of language choice were shaped by a single constraint: humans write the code, and humans are slow at low-level languages. That constraint is gone. Stack Overflow’s 2025 survey had Rust as the most-admired language for the tenth consecutive year at 72%, with Gleam at 70%, Elixir at 66%, and Zig at 64%. The stated preference was always there; the tooling finally caught up to the preference.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>